While procedural justice theory has become the dominant paradigm in thinking about police legitimacy, it has several important weaknesses. First, procedural justice’s conceptually essential distinction between ‘process’ and ‘outcome’ is blurred in reality, which is visible both in empirical operationalizations and in researchers’ understanding of police work. Second, procedural justice theory views society through an implicit consensus lens, making it poorly equipped to address police–citizen conflicts and structural societal inequalities. This is evident in the theory’s inability to unpack the dynamics of police–citizen interactions and its reluctance to problematize the police role in contemporary plural societies. To advance our understanding of police legitimacy and police–citizen relations, particularly among marginalized groups, we strongly recommend working toward theoretical renewal and empirical diversification.
Latest News
International conference POLICE STOPS ACROSS EUROPE (28 February 2023, The Hague, The Netherlands)
News
For more than four years, our EU COST funded network on Police Stops has been gathering information, hearing from experts…
Read moreWorkshop 'Registration of police stops and ethnicity and defining the police stop' 31 Aug - 2 Sept 2022
News
In line with our project’s ambition to share learning and explore the issue police stops across Europe, we are organising…
Read moreCfP European Journal of Policing Studies - Special Issue: The Dynamics of Police Stops
News
European Journal of Policing Studies Special Issue: The Dynamics of Police Stops Guest editors: Mike Rowe Sofie de Kimpe Vincenzo…
Read morePolstops Newsletter n4 (June 2022)
News
At last, we have been able to meet again. And we can now begin to identify what we have missed…
Read more