We introduce a model to explore the identification of two distinct sources of bias in the New York Police Department’s stop-and-frisk program: the police officer making the stop decisions and the police chief allocating personnel across precincts. We analyze 10 years of data from the stop-and-frisk program in light of this theoretical framework. We find that white pedestrians are slightly less likely than African American pedestrians to be arrested conditional on being stopped. We interpret this finding as evidence that the officers making the stops are on average not biased against African Americans relative to whites, because the latter are stopped despite being a less productive stop for a police officer. We find suggestive evidence of police bias in the decision to frisk. Further research is needed.
Latest News
International conference POLICE STOPS ACROSS EUROPE (28 February 2023, The Hague, The Netherlands)
News
For more than four years, our EU COST funded network on Police Stops has been gathering information, hearing from experts…
Read moreWorkshop 'Registration of police stops and ethnicity and defining the police stop' 31 Aug - 2 Sept 2022
News
In line with our project’s ambition to share learning and explore the issue police stops across Europe, we are organising…
Read moreCfP European Journal of Policing Studies - Special Issue: The Dynamics of Police Stops
News
European Journal of Policing Studies Special Issue: The Dynamics of Police Stops Guest editors: Mike Rowe Sofie de Kimpe Vincenzo…
Read morePolstops Newsletter n4 (June 2022)
News
At last, we have been able to meet again. And we can now begin to identify what we have missed…
Read more